Before reading this you should have all the background and read my previous blog. If you do wish to respond, and I actively encourage it, please be polite and considerate - I'm a sesitive soul.
We shouldn’t draw any conclusions from the Margaret’s silence on my question but we can see clearly from Nigel’s post he hasn’t had any problems with state bodies and hotels.
With regard to the local authorities I have written to the Department of the Environment to seek clarification of their requirements for local authorities and await their response. It is hard to get a definitive answer from anyone but as the Department are responsible for all local authorities they should give some clarity to this confused area.
As Nigel has written much better than I could I am not going to rehash his points again. I would, however, like to make a number of observations and pose a number of questions:-
- By setting a defined level of cover for Public Liability insurance the IPPA has helped to promote the high levels of litigation in Ireland. Why couldn’t the IPPA simply ask members to have PL cover and allow them be advised by their respective brokers.
- Is making insurance a major selling point of the association a good idea? It is important but it shouldn’t be our unique selling point. What should our letter head say - “Come on sue me – I’ve got the cover.”
- Have the IPPA ever looked for tenders from brokers other then O’Brien Finlay when looking for deals for their members. Times have changed and with the entrance of many companies into the market place, Quinn Direct, Eagle Star, Norwich Union etc we should be reviewing our arrangements on a regular basis. If, yes, please supply full details of how this tender process was under taken, when it was undertaken, who was approached and when is it up for review again?
- If not, why not?
- Who are the members of the review committee and how are they appointed? When was their last report published on the IPPA internet for members to read.
While some may accuse me of washing IPPA dirty laundry in public I see this as an industry wide issue. The IPPA have set a precedent with this mandatory cover requirement and all professional photographers should be aware of the implications. Also the IPPA have no forum for addressing these issues as they arise and to date have not facilitated "a right to reply" on issues. A letter to the secretary re Public Liability was responded to with the answer “It is council policy”.
Thanks
Alan Murphy
Recent Comments